Post by account_disabled on Jan 1, 2024 2:15:26 GMT -5
ACode. The conclusion by which the evidence is approved will show the facts that will have to be proven the evidence approved as well as the obligations of the parties in relation to their administration art. para. and art. of the same code. The unmotivated rejection of a requested piece of evidence makes the decision illegal and groundless because it is not possible to verify the reason for which the requested pieces of evidence were rejected. It is recalled in this sense that the conclusion of the court regarding the approval of the evidence can be challenged with an appeal together with the merits art. para. of the same code.
In relation to the arguments of the author of the exception regarding the Country Email List arbitrary and abusive censorship of the evidence by the judge it is stated that the provisions of art. para. of the Code of Civil Procedure enshrining the active role of the judge in resolving the case regulates his duty to insist by all legal means to prevent any mistake regarding the discovery of the truth in the case based on the establishment of the facts and by the correct application of the law in order to pronounce a thorough and legal decision.
For this purpose regarding the factual situation and the legal reasoning that the parties invoke the judge has the right to ask them to present explanations orally or in writing to put into their debate any factual or legal in the request or response to order the administration of the evidence it considers necessary as well as other measures provided by law even if the parties object. Thus taking into account the cited legal text the Peoples Advocate finds that an expression of the active role is also the judges competence to administer the necessary evidence in order to clarify.
In relation to the arguments of the author of the exception regarding the Country Email List arbitrary and abusive censorship of the evidence by the judge it is stated that the provisions of art. para. of the Code of Civil Procedure enshrining the active role of the judge in resolving the case regulates his duty to insist by all legal means to prevent any mistake regarding the discovery of the truth in the case based on the establishment of the facts and by the correct application of the law in order to pronounce a thorough and legal decision.
For this purpose regarding the factual situation and the legal reasoning that the parties invoke the judge has the right to ask them to present explanations orally or in writing to put into their debate any factual or legal in the request or response to order the administration of the evidence it considers necessary as well as other measures provided by law even if the parties object. Thus taking into account the cited legal text the Peoples Advocate finds that an expression of the active role is also the judges competence to administer the necessary evidence in order to clarify.